sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Triumph Tiger Sport 660 vs Triumph Tiger Sport 800 ergonomics
Triumph Tiger Sport 660 and Triumph Tiger Sport 800 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Triumph Tiger Sport 660
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger Sport 800
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Triumph Tiger Sport 660 has a 835 mm seat; the Triumph Tiger Sport 800 sits at 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 84 cm for the Triumph Tiger Sport 660 and 84 cm for the Triumph Tiger Sport 800.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Triumph Tiger Sport 660 | Triumph Tiger Sport 800 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,418 mm | 1,422 mm |
| Wet weight | 207 kg | 214 kg |
| Displacement | 660 cc | 798 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 800
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Neutral (91.2 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 800
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 800
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Neutral (12.8 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 800
- Neutral (12.8 deg)