electric / default rider 183 cm
Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2 vs Yamaha NEO's ergonomics
Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2 and Yamaha NEO's land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2
All contacts reached
Yamaha NEO's
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2 has a 800 mm seat; the Yamaha NEO's sits at 795 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 80 cm for the Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2 and 80 cm for the Yamaha NEO's.
That makes the Yamaha NEO's the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2 | Yamaha NEO's |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 800 mm | 795 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,340 mm | 1,305 mm |
| Wet weight | 197 kg | - |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Yamaha NEO's
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2
- Neutral (96.5 deg)
- Yamaha NEO's
- Neutral (97.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha NEO's
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Ultraviolette F77 Mach 2
- Neutral (10.4 deg)
- Yamaha NEO's
- Neutral (9.9 deg)