three-wheeler / default rider 183 cm
Ural Tourist vs Yamaha Tricity 125 ergonomics
Ural Tourist and Yamaha Tricity 125 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Ural Tourist
All contacts reached
Yamaha Tricity 125
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Ural Tourist lists a 787 mm seat; the Yamaha Tricity 125 lists 785 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Ural Tourist | Yamaha Tricity 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 787 mm | 785 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,499 mm | 1,410 mm |
| Wet weight | 331 kg | 168 kg |
| Displacement | 750 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Ural Tourist
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Yamaha Tricity 125
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Ural Tourist
- Neutral (93.1 deg)
- Yamaha Tricity 125
- Neutral (94.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Ural Tourist
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha Tricity 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Ural Tourist
- Neutral (12.7 deg)
- Yamaha Tricity 125
- Neutral (11.5 deg)