three-wheeler / default rider 183 cm
Ural Tourist vs Yamaha Tricity 125 ergonomics
Ural Tourist and Yamaha Tricity 125 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Ural Tourist
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Yamaha Tricity 125
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Ural Tourist has a 787 mm seat; the Yamaha Tricity 125 sits at 785 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 79 cm for the Ural Tourist and 79 cm for the Yamaha Tricity 125.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Ural Tourist | Yamaha Tricity 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 787 mm | 785 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,499 mm | 1,410 mm |
| Wet weight | 331 kg | 168 kg |
| Displacement | 750 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Ural Tourist
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Yamaha Tricity 125
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Ural Tourist
- Neutral (93.1 deg)
- Yamaha Tricity 125
- Neutral (94.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Ural Tourist
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha Tricity 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Ural Tourist
- Neutral (12.7 deg)
- Yamaha Tricity 125
- Neutral (11.5 deg)