bagger / default rider 183 cm
Victory Cross Roads vs Victory Hard-Ball ergonomics
Victory Cross Roads and Victory Hard-Ball land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Victory Cross Roads
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
Victory Hard-Ball
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Victory Cross Roads has a 667 mm seat; the Victory Hard-Ball sits at 667 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 67 cm for the Victory Cross Roads and 67 cm for the Victory Hard-Ball.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Victory Cross Roads | Victory Hard-Ball |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 667 mm | 667 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,670 mm | 1,670 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 1,731 cc | 1,731 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Victory Cross Roads
- Open (112.0 deg)
- Victory Hard-Ball
- Open (112.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Victory Cross Roads
- Sport (80.0 deg)
- Victory Hard-Ball
- Sport (80.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- Victory Cross Roads
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Victory Hard-Ball
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Victory Cross Roads
- Neutral (8.4 deg)
- Victory Hard-Ball
- Neutral (8.4 deg)