Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Yamaha WR200R vs Yamaha WR400F ergonomics

Yamaha WR200R and Yamaha WR400F have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Yamaha WR200R

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Yamaha WR400F

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Yamaha WR200R lists a 990 mm seat; the Yamaha WR400F lists 991 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Yamaha WR200R and Yamaha WR400F
SpecYamaha WR200RYamaha WR400F
Seat height990 mm991 mm
Wheelbase1,460 mm1,480 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement200 cc399 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Yamaha WR200R
Sport (58.1 deg)
Yamaha WR400F
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Yamaha WR200R
Neutral (93.7 deg)
Yamaha WR400F
Neutral (93.3 deg)

Elbow angle

Yamaha WR200R
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Yamaha WR400F
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Yamaha WR200R
Neutral (12.2 deg)
Yamaha WR400F
Neutral (12.5 deg)