scrambler / default rider 183 cm
Fantic Caballero Travel 700 vs Royal Enfield Bear 650 ergonomics
Fantic Caballero Travel 700 and Royal Enfield Bear 650 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Fantic Caballero Travel 700
All contacts reached
Royal Enfield Bear 650
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Fantic Caballero Travel 700 lists a 830 mm seat; the Royal Enfield Bear 650 lists 830 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Fantic Caballero Travel 700 | Royal Enfield Bear 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 830 mm | 830 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,460 mm | 1,460 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 216 kg |
| Displacement | 689 cc | 648 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Fantic Caballero Travel 700
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Royal Enfield Bear 650
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Fantic Caballero Travel 700
- Neutral (93.7 deg)
- Royal Enfield Bear 650
- Neutral (93.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- Fantic Caballero Travel 700
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Royal Enfield Bear 650
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Fantic Caballero Travel 700
- Neutral (12.2 deg)
- Royal Enfield Bear 650
- Neutral (12.2 deg)