adventure / default rider 183 cm
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin vs Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro ergonomics
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin and Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin lists a 851 mm seat; the Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro lists 850 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin | Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 851 mm | 850 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,575 mm | 1,560 mm |
| Wet weight | 232 kg | 245 kg |
| Displacement | 998 cc | 1,160 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin
- Sport (65.7 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro
- Sport (65.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin
- Neutral (99.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro
- Neutral (99.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin
- Neutral (11.0 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro
- Neutral (10.7 deg)