sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki GSX1250FA vs Yamaha FJR1300ES ergonomics
Yamaha FJR1300ES has the higher modeled posture score (100 vs 95) for the 183 cm default rider compared with Suzuki GSX1250FA. Treat this as a planning estimate, not a comfort or purchase verdict; compare the source confidence and confirm both bikes in person.
Posture overlay
The default rider's modeled seated posture on each bike, solved from the same geometry as the score panels and overlaid on one ground line so seat height and reach differences are visible at a glance.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki GSX1250FA
All contacts reached
Yamaha FJR1300ES
All contacts reached
Yamaha FJR1300ES scores higher for the 183 cm default rider in this model. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki GSX1250FA lists a 805 mm seat; the Yamaha FJR1300ES lists 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki GSX1250FA | Yamaha FJR1300ES |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,486 mm | 1,545 mm |
| Wet weight | 257 kg | 291 kg |
| Displacement | 1,255 cc | 1,298 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki GSX1250FA
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (79.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki GSX1250FA
- Neutral (89.8 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (108.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki GSX1250FA
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki GSX1250FA
- Neutral (13.5 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (16.2 deg)
Fit by rider height
Modeled ground contact by rider height, in 5 bands from 5'2" to 6'4" (158-193 cm).
| Rider height | Suzuki GSX1250FA | Yamaha FJR1300ES |
|---|---|---|
| 158 cm / 5'2" | Tiptoe only | Tiptoe only |
| 167 cm / 5'6" | Balls of feet | Balls of feet |
| 176 cm / 5'9" | Both feet flat | Both feet flat |
| 184 cm / 6'0" | Both feet flat | Both feet flat |
| 193 cm / 6'4" | Both feet flat | Both feet flat |
Modeled from each bike's seat height and a typical inseam-to-height ratio only — not a flat-footing guarantee. Real ground contact still depends on seat shape, suspension sag, footwear, and your own proportions. Confirm on the motorcycle.
Verdict
Suzuki GSX1250FA and Yamaha FJR1300ES are both sport-touring bikes, so the practical question is which of their real differences you'd actually feel. Suzuki GSX1250FA is about 34 kg lighter wet than Yamaha FJR1300ES, which tends to show up most when paddling backward out of a parking spot or picking the bike up off the sidestand. The modeled knee angle differs by 22° between the two, with Yamaha FJR1300ES opening the knee further — a more stretched-out leg position than Suzuki GSX1250FA's. Yamaha FJR1300ES runs a 59 mm longer wheelbase than Suzuki GSX1250FA, which typically trades some low-speed agility for extra stability at speed. Taken together, the modeled posture score favors the Yamaha FJR1300ES by 5 points for the 183 cm default rider, though score gaps this size can flip for a taller or shorter build. Treat every figure here as a planning estimate: seat width, suspension sag, footwear, and your own proportions can shift the real feel more than a few millimetres or degrees on paper. Load your height and inseam into the simulator, then sit on both before you decide.
Kit out either bike
Related comparisons
- Suzuki Gsx1250fa 2011 vs Triumph Sprint St 1050 2005
- Aprilia RST1000 Futura vs BMW K 1200 S ergonomics
- Aprilia RST1000 Futura vs BMW K 1300 S ergonomics
- Aprilia RST1000 Futura vs BMW R 1250 RS ergonomics
- BMW F 900 XR vs Kawasaki Z1000SX ergonomics
- BMW F800GT vs Honda ST1100 ergonomics